Rystad said earlier this week that, although spending will slowly start to rise from 2022, it will not reach pre-crisis levels in the coming period.
Oslo, May 17 - Neftegaz.RU.
The toll of the Covid-19
pandemic on upstream investments in the first 2 years of the downturn is estimated at a whopping $285 billion, according to a Rystad Energy report.
The shale sector has been the most affected, with conventional exploration and investments in mature assets suffering the least thus far.
In February 2020, before Covid-19 started impacting the global energy system, Rystad estimated global upstream investments for the year would end up at around $530 billion, almost at the same level as in 2019.
’s forecast at the time suggested 2021 investments would remain in line with the previous year’s level.
However, as the Covid-19 pandemic triggered a collapse in oil prices
during the early part of the 2nd quarter last year, E&P companies slashed investment budgets to protect cash flow.
This spending trend was not reversed in 2021, when prices rose.
Compared to pre-pandemic
estimates for 2020 and 2021, Rystad observes that spending fell by around $145 billion last year and will end up losing $140 billion by the end of this year.
This implies Covid-19 removed 27 % of planned investments.
spending was limited to $382 billion in 2020 and is forecast to marginally grow to $390 billion this year.
Rystad expects the effect of the pandemic to be a lasting one as – even though spending will start growing from 2022 – it will not return to the pre-pandemic level of $530 billion.
Growth will be limited and investments will only inch up annually, rising to just over $480 billion in 2025, when this report’s forecast ends.
Over the 2-year period between 2020 and 2021, shale
/tight oil investments are the ones most affected in both absolute and percentage terms, losing $96 billion of the previously expected spending, or 39% for the sector.
Exploration spending is expected to drop by $19 billion, or 22%, compared to what was previously forecast.
Greenfield investment in new conventional projects will suffer a $78 billion loss, or 28%, while brownfield investment in existing such projects will fall by $92 billion, or 20%.