The project also attracted the attention of the new global gas export giant, the U.S., for which the European market is a most lucrative one thanks to its repetitively stated desire to diversify gas supply sources.
The U.S. slapped sanctions on the Russian participants in NS 2 and threatened their Western European partners with sanctions, too.
Germany opposed this, for which reason NS 2 has proceeded and is now nearing completion.
And yet, Europe is facing a gas crunch this winter and is eager to see NS 2 go live.
One EC official told the Financial Times in July:
- There were no indications of specific behaviour by any of our suppliers to drive up prices
- The current situation is a reflection of global market dynamics
- All EU regions now have access to more than one source of gas, so are less vulnerable to supply squeezes coming from an individual supplier
Yet the TAP, which carries Azeri gas, has only a fifth of the capacity that either NS 2 pipe has: it can move 10 billion m3 annually, which equals 2% of Europe’s gas consumption.
Also, most of the gas TAP brings into Europe goes to Italy.
The pipeline could be expanded, but this is in the future.
Meanwhile, Europe is facing a gas shortage that prompted an executive from the UK’s Centrica, the utility that owns British Gas, to warn that Britons are facing higher electricity bills this winter and some businesses might be forced to curb activity, not only in the UK but in Europe, too.
Meanwhile, Ukraine is still calling on Europe to stop NS 2 despite assurances from Chancellor Merkel personally that she would not allow Gazprom to deprive Ukraine of the transit fees it receives now for the Russian gas it ships via other pipelines to Europe.
So, Europe resents Russian gas for the influence it gives a country that the EU considers unfriendly, to put it mildly, but at the same time, it is increasingly thirsty for gas because of a prolonged winter last year that drained its reserves.
That winter was unfortunately followed by a busy Asian summer that saw LNG cargoes getting diverted from Europe to Asia because Asian buyers were ready to pay higher prices.
And here comes the twist: even if the attempts to stop NS 2 fail, the new pipe will not lead to an increase in European gas deliveries from Russia.
The reason is simple: whenever the pipeline starts, Gazprom’s planned deliveries to Europe for full-2021 are set at 183 billion m3.
And with or without NS 2, this figure will remain unchanged, the state company said at the end of August.
The new pipe could ship an additional 5.6 billion m3, the head of Gazprom’s finance department said during an earnings call.
But this won’t make a big difference.
So, is Russia already wielding the gas weapon that the EU and Ukraine have feared for years?
That may well be the case, according to some observers, per a recent article by Energy Intelligence’ Vitaly Sokolov.
Chancellor Merkel said recently that in 25 years, Europe will no longer need Russian gas.
That would certainly make the continent a lot more energy independent and remove a major headache that is keeping officials in Brussels awake at night.
As long as it happens.